Admiring Light
Menu
  • Home
  • Review Index
  • Shop Talk
  • Technique and Vision
  • Opinion
  • Portfolio
  • Site Index
  • About
    • Privacy Policy
Menu

Review: Sony FE 24-70mm f/2.8 GM

Posted on May 5, 2016May 11, 2016 by Jordan Steele

Contents

  • 1Construction and Handling
  • 2Autofocus
  • 3Image Quality
  • 4Distortion, Flare and Vignetting
  • 5Conclusion
  • 6Image Samples

Early this year, Sony announced three new members of a new lens line, the “G Master” line, to denote top end professional grade lenses. Two of them are the key pro-grade zoom lenses that are essential to high-end systems: the 24-70mm f/2.8 and the 70-200mm f/2.8, while also releasing a fast portrait prime in the 85mm f/1.4.  Today I’m looking at the new standard zoom, the 24-70mm f/2.8 G Master (GM).  After the good, but not great performance of the slower FE 24-70mm f/4, hopes are very high that Sony has crafted a truly exceptional zoom lens this time around.  It’s a big, heavy and expensive lens that retails for a shade under $2,200, but will the performance justify the cost and size? Let’s find out.

The Sony 24-70mm f/2.8 GM on the Sony A7 II
The Sony 24-70mm f/2.8 GM on the Sony A7 II

Construction and Handling

The FE 24-70mm f/2.8 is, to put it mildly, big. It’s larger and heavier than Canon’s 24-70mm f/2.8L II and nearly the same size as Nikon’s 24-70mm f/2.8G.  Tipping the scales at a hair under 2 lbs and measuring over 5 inches long, the 24-70mm GM is a beast of a lens. For those who are shooting professionally and need the speed in their standard zoom, it’s just part of the package, but the weight is noticeable and sometimes awkward.  The base of the lens leaves enough clearance to keep the grip clear, so overall handling is fine, but if you’re carrying this in your hands all day long, you will begin to tire of it.  Still, none of this is unexpected. There’s no free lunch with speed, and for the optical quality needed to perform well on today’s bodies, size is simply part of the cost of doing business with a lens such as this.

Like most standard zooms, the 24-70mm GM extends during zooming
Like most standard zooms, the 24-70mm GM extends during zooming

In line with its cost and target market, the 24-70mm f/2.8 is very robustly constructed.  A mix of very high-end plastics and metals make up the exterior construction, and tolerances are very tight.  It’s a very dense and very solid lens, with absolutely no flex anywhere on the lens, even when extended to 70mm.  The inner lens tube extends around 2 inches towards the long end of the focal range, and there’s no wobbling, even at full extension.  The zoom and focus rings are very well damped and feel extremely solid.  This is a lens that feels like a professional tool.  The lens is sealed against dust and moisture, and unlike earlier Sony lenses with weather sealing, there is a small foam rubber gasket at the lens mount. Unfortunately, it’s so short that it actually doesn’t make contact with the face of the lens mount, thus making it completely useless in practice.  Why can’t Sony design a proper mount gasket?  Still, gasket aside, the lens is impeccably assembled and wonderfully solid.

Autofocus

The FE 24-70mm GM has a quick and quiet focus motor.  In most situations, the focus locked very quickly and surely, with excellent accuracy.  I did have some misses when shooting at very small apertures, however, where the camera would get confused with the deep depth of field and focus too closely, simply due to the way Sony focuses while stopped down.  I still don’t know why Sony doesn’t do what every other manufacturer in the world does and focus wide open and stop down when making the exposure.

The 24-70mm f/2.8 is professionally built, but big
The 24-70mm f/2.8 is professionally built, but big

Continuous Autofocus is plenty fast enough to keep up with the demands of event shooting at wider apertures, and while this sort of lens isn’t geared towards sports action, in good light, I think that it would track quite well on the newer bodies in these situations.

One very nice feature on the 24-70mm f/2.8 is the close focus ability.  The lens focuses as close as 0.38m, with a maximum magnification of around 1:4, which is quite good for a non-macro lens. This enables close up photography for flowers, large insects like butterflies and other detail type shots.  It definitely makes the lens a more versatile thing to have in your bag.

Continue: Image Quality

Pages: 1 2 3

18 thoughts on “Review: Sony FE 24-70mm f/2.8 GM”

  1. Pingback: 24-70mm GM review by Admiringlight: “I’ve never used a standard lens that is this sharp” | sonyalpharumors
  2. Pingback: Sony FE 24-70mm f/2.8 GM Lens Review by AdmiringLight: Truly Remarkable! | photoHANGOUT
  3. JJ Backer says:
    May 8, 2016 at 11:14 am

    Thanks for confirming that your 24-70GM lens mount does not fully contact the A7RII lens mounting flange. I noticed the same on my 2nd day of shooting. I have reported this to Sony Pro Support several times over the last month with obsoletely no response from them! I definitely would not call it ‘PRO’ support. The touted ‘weather sealing’ was one of the main reasons I chose to buy this lens as I shoot primarily coastal landscapes in Hawaii.

    I would appreciate it if you could inform Sony of your findings about the lack of a true ‘Seal’ between the lens and A7RII lens mount. The lens is not truly ‘sealed’ as it was clearly advertised by sony. The only way to get Sony’s attention and acknowledgment of this flaw is to get as many users as possible to complaint about this issue. For $2200 they should offer to repair / modify or replace the seal on this otherwise exceptional lens. It’s a shame that sony can not get something so simple as a sub $1.00 gasket right the first time.

    Reply
  4. Yan says:
    May 8, 2016 at 1:02 pm

    This is the best 24-70 GM so far, quite impressive! Thanks so much for sharing!

    Reply
  5. curious says:
    May 8, 2016 at 9:28 pm

    How would you rate this vs Fuji’s 16-55?

    Reply
    1. Jordan Steele says:
      May 9, 2016 at 9:09 am

      It’s better. The Fuji was good, but didn’t really blow me completely away. I was very surprised at how good the 24-70 GM was.

      Reply
  6. Minion says:
    May 10, 2016 at 11:30 am

    I was on the fence regarding this lens and decided to pass. The convenience of a standard zoom for the A7RII with a decent IQ was enticing for the convenience factor alone. However, the lack of IS and the “extending” design is a dealbreaker for me. My old Nikon 24-70 f2.8 VR G-lens had none of these limitations; I would have thought SONY would have stepped up to the overall sophistication and quality level other than just matching the price.

    The seal issue is another design and/or manufacturing flaw but the reported lack of response from SONY’s ironically labeled “Pro” support arm if true, would be yet another reason to stay far away.

    I really hope the company rebalance its priorities and focuses on Q/A more instead of overfunded creative marketing.

    Reply
  7. Pingback: Sony G Master Lens 24-70mm Called "Exceptional"
  8. Pingback: Review: Sony FE 85mm f/1.4 GM - Admiring Light
  9. Nash's says:
    May 27, 2016 at 7:53 pm

    Actually the best standard zoom is the canon 24-70 2.8 II. I use this via meta ones on my A7R II.
    I know Sony has put forth an aggressive marketing campaign for their G master lenses by using these “reviews”
    But the Images I see using the Sony compared to my canon are not in the same universe. The Sony is good but not in the prime like sharpness class of its canon counterpart.
    The Canon 24-70 2.8 II is a legendary performer that has not yet been matched much less out performed.

    Reply
    1. Jordan Steele says:
      May 27, 2016 at 8:06 pm

      Considering I paid to rent the lens to write a review on it, I can most assuredly say this isn’t a marketing campaign. It’s a stellar lens. Having not put it head to head with the Canon, I can’t say which is better, but the Sony is the best standard zoom I have used. I won’t buy it – it’s too expensive for me and too big for my type of shooting and my desires, but it is truly excellent. Lens rentals did a test with the Sony, Canon and Nikon and the Sony and Canon were at the top and very comparable.

      Reply
    2. Edward De Bruyn says:
      July 8, 2016 at 4:22 am

      Tested my 24-75 Canon and had good results at 24mm but at 35mm and more the extreme corners presented some smearing effect in combination with my Sony A7r2.
      Maybe some extreme field curvature or a bad copy.
      Didn’t see it with some legacy glass, 30-70mm f3.4 Contax C/Y for example. Should say this lens performs almost as good as my 28f2.8 and 50mmf2.8 Contax C/Y…
      Didn’t have the possibility to test the new Sony 24-70 f2.8 but ill do it.
      For the moment in a landscape mode and must confess that I’m very happy with the Contax 30-70 C/Y.
      But use most of the time the Sony 16-35mm (Loxia 21mm and Samyang 14mm for night shots).

      Thanks for this excellent review

      Reply
      1. Edward De Bruyn says:
        July 8, 2016 at 4:24 am

        Was actually the Canon 24-70 2.8 II (not 24-75), sorry

        Reply
  10. Pingback: Sony FE 24-70mm f/2.8 GM lens reviews roundup - Daily Camera News
  11. Pingback: Sony FE 24-70mm f/2.8 GM lens reviews roundup | photoHANGOUT
  12. Pingback: Additional Sony FE 24-70mm f/2.8 GM lens reviews
  13. Pingback: ???FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM???????????????????????????? | ?????????????
  14. Pingback: The Best Lenses - In My Experience - Admiring Light

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Follow Me:

Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on RSSFollow Us on InstagramFollow Us on Mastodon

Most Popular Posts

  • "Full Frame Equivalence" and Why It Doesn't Matter (288)
  • Fuji X-Pro 2 vs. Sony A7 II: Noise Comparison (70)
  • Fuji 56mm f/1.2 vs. Panasonic Leica 42.5mm f/1.2 Nocticron (63)
  • Review: Metabones Speed Booster (Canon FD to Fuji X) (56)
  • Review: Olympus OM-D E-M5 (48)

Recent Comments

  • Peter on A Tripod in the Sky – DJI Air 2S Review
  • Eric Wojtkun on My Favorite Photos of 2022
  • Jordan Steele on “Full Frame Equivalence” and Why It Doesn’t Matter
  • Leon on “Full Frame Equivalence” and Why It Doesn’t Matter
  • Clarke jones on Review: TTArtisan 50mm f/1.4 ASPH (RF Mount)

Archives

©2023 Admiring Light | Theme by SuperbThemes
We use cookies to personalize content and ads and to analyze our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with advertising and analytics partners who may combine it with other information that you’ve provided to them or that they’ve collected from your use of their services. You may consent to the use of cookies or opt out. Accept Reject Read More
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled

Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.

SAVE & ACCEPT