Admiring Light
Menu
  • Home
  • Review Index
  • Shop Talk
  • Technique and Vision
  • Opinion
  • Portfolio
  • Site Index
  • About
    • Privacy Policy
Menu

Review: Sony FE 70-200mm f/4 G OSS

Posted on March 4, 2016 by Jordan Steele

Contents

  • 1Construction and Handling
  • 2Autofocus and Image Stabilization
  • 3Image Quality
  • 4Distortion, Flare and Vignetting
  • 5Conclusion
  • 6Image Samples

Conclusion

Pros

  • Very well built lens with excellent zoom and focus feel
  • Fast and accurate autofocus
  • Sharp over most of the frame right from f/4
  • Good bokeh
  • Versatile focal range
  • Very good chromatic aberration control
  • Good contrast and neutral color
  • Optically Stabilized

Cons

  • Poor flare control
  • Some edge softness at 200mm, even stopped down
  • Focal length shortens considerably at close focus
  • Expensive

 

The FE 70-200mm f/4 G OSS is a high quality telephoto zoom lens that produces sharp images with pleasing bokeh and good color and contrast.  The lens focuses very fast and the optical stabilizer allows for an extra two to three stops of handholdability.  It’s also a very well built lens with great haptics.  If you need a native telephoto zoom, it’s a great option.  However, given the high $1,499 price tag, I expected just a bit more.  It’s a very good lens, but performance wise, it’s about on par with my $599 Canon 70-200mm f/4L.  Now, that lens is a very good lens, and the FE is very good as well, but Sony is asking $250 more than the Canon 70-200mm f/4L IS (which is optically superior) and $100 more than the Nikon variant.  For the extra cash, you’d hope for some extra performance.

Still, price aside, it’s a very good zoom lens, and one that will fit perfectly for shooters on both the full-frame A7 bodies and the APS-C E-Mount cameras. If you can get over the price premium, it’s an excellent option for the Sony shooter.

Image Samples

Click on an image to enlarge

Columbus Bridges - Sony A7 II with Sony FE 70-200mm f/4 G OSS @
Columbus Bridges – Sony A7 II with Sony FE 70-200mm f/4 G OSS @ 128mm, f/8
Goose at Sunrise - Sony A7 II with Sony FE 70-200mm f/4 G OSS @ 200mm, f/4
Goose at Sunrise – Sony A7 II with Sony FE 70-200mm f/4 G OSS @ 200mm, f/4
Flowing Kiss - Sony A7 II with Sony FE 70-200mm f/4 G OSS @
Flowing Kiss – Sony A7 II with Sony FE 70-200mm f/4 G OSS @ 83mm, f/4
Ruin Monster - Sony A7 II with Sony FE 70-200mm f/4 G OSS @
Ruin Monster – Sony A7 II with Sony FE 70-200mm f/4 G OSS @ 149mm, f/4
Goose in the Snow - Sony A7 II with Sony FE 70-200mm f/4 G OSS @
Goose in the Snow – Sony A7 II with Sony FE 70-200mm f/4 G OSS @ 200mm, f/4
On the Scooter - Sony a6000 with Sony FE 70-200mm f/4 G OSS @ 200mm, f/4
On the Scooter – Sony a6000 with Sony FE 70-200mm f/4 G OSS @ 200mm, f/4 (continuous AF)
Metal Poles - Sony A7 II with Sony FE 70-200mm f/4 G OSS @
Metal Poles – Sony A7 II with Sony FE 70-200mm f/4 G OSS @ 172mm, f/11
City in the Background - Sony A7 II with Sony FE 70-200mm f/4 G OSS @ 200mm, f/4
City in the Background – Sony A7 II with Sony FE 70-200mm f/4 G OSS @ 200mm, f/4
Snow Train - Sony A7 II with Sony FE 70-200mm f/4 G OSS @
Snow Train – Sony A7 II with Sony FE 70-200mm f/4 G OSS @ 200mm, f/4
Columbus at Night - Sony A7 II with Sony FE 70-200mm f/4 G OSS @
Columbus at Night – Sony A7 II with Sony FE 70-200mm f/4 G OSS @ 70mm, f/8
Building in the Snow (focus on the snow) - Sony A7 II with Sony FE 70-200mm f/4 G OSS @
Building in the Snow (focus on the snow) – Sony A7 II with Sony FE 70-200mm f/4 G OSS @ 200mm, f/5.6

 

 

Pages: 1 2 3

10 thoughts on “Review: Sony FE 70-200mm f/4 G OSS”

  1. Brian Allan says:
    March 5, 2016 at 9:52 pm

    I have the FE 70-200 and the FE 24-240, as well as a Canon 70-200 f/2.8. I use all of them on Sony A7S, A7R, A7 II and A7R II bodies.

    I find the FE 70-200’s image quality far inferior to the Canon 70-200’s and probably about the same, if not worse, than the FE 24-240. It is very soft on the edges and in the corners, and if you attempt to use it for astrophotography you’ll find you get both star stretch and coma on the edges and in the corners.

    For the price, the Sony FE 70-200 f/4 is NOT a good deal!!

    Buy a Canon lens and Metabones adapter. You’ll spend about the same and get good image quality across the full sensor of a full frame camera. Or spend a lot less and get about the same image quality with the FE 24-240 and get a 24 -> 240mm field-of-view.

    Reply
    1. Jordan Steele says:
      March 6, 2016 at 9:29 am

      While I agree that the Canon 70-200s are a good option for many people. I have gone that route as well for my own kit (with the 70-200/4L), but it sounds to me like you have a copy of the lens with some optical defects, as your description of the performance doesn’t match my experience with the Sony at all. I do think the lens is a bit overpriced (as I mentioned in my conclusion), but it’s still a very good lens.

      Reply
  2. John Oakley says:
    March 12, 2016 at 2:04 am

    My copy of the 70-200 blows away my copy of the 24-240 in IQ. I did get one bad copy first which was horrendous but the second one is phenomenal. Really is worth the cash!

    Reply
  3. colin Eastwood says:
    March 12, 2016 at 4:03 am

    My copy is exceptional sharp and is sharper than my Minolta 80-200 APO HS and not far off the focus speed.

    Reply
  4. Steve says:
    March 12, 2016 at 11:31 am

    Can you use it with a speed booster? How would the Cannon IS version perform on the new A6300? What is the best use of $1000 in this case? Cannon or a used Sony? I always enjoy your pictures by the way, you seem to have a better eye than most bloggers for sure 🙂

    Reply
    1. Jordan Steele says:
      March 12, 2016 at 12:13 pm

      You should be able to use it with a Speed Booster. My guess is it would work quite well, but I haven’t tested the a6300 yet.

      Reply
  5. Pingback: Sony Tidbits… | sonyalpharumors
  6. Paul Corcoran says:
    August 10, 2016 at 1:07 am

    Best review I’ve seen of this lens. Good job!

    Reply
  7. Pingback: ??? FE 70-200mm F4 G OSS ??????????? ??????? | ?????????????
  8. Pingback: Sony FE 70-200mm f/4 G OSS Review | GearOpen

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Follow Me:

Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on RSSFollow Us on InstagramFollow Us on Mastodon

Most Popular Posts

  • "Full Frame Equivalence" and Why It Doesn't Matter (288)
  • Fuji X-Pro 2 vs. Sony A7 II: Noise Comparison (70)
  • Fuji 56mm f/1.2 vs. Panasonic Leica 42.5mm f/1.2 Nocticron (63)
  • Review: Metabones Speed Booster (Canon FD to Fuji X) (56)
  • Review: Olympus OM-D E-M5 (48)

Recent Comments

  • Eric Wojtkun on My Favorite Photos of 2022
  • Jordan Steele on “Full Frame Equivalence” and Why It Doesn’t Matter
  • Leon on “Full Frame Equivalence” and Why It Doesn’t Matter
  • Clarke jones on Review: TTArtisan 50mm f/1.4 ASPH (RF Mount)
  • Anonymous on Sony A7 III vs. A7 II – Noise Comparison

Archives

©2023 Admiring Light | Theme by SuperbThemes
We use cookies to personalize content and ads and to analyze our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with advertising and analytics partners who may combine it with other information that you’ve provided to them or that they’ve collected from your use of their services. You may consent to the use of cookies or opt out. Accept Reject Read More
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled

Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.

SAVE & ACCEPT