Admiring Light
Menu
  • Home
  • Review Index
  • Shop Talk
  • Technique and Vision
  • Opinion
  • Portfolio
  • Site Index
  • About
    • Privacy Policy
Menu

Review: TTArtisan 50mm f/1.4 ASPH (RF Mount)

Posted on October 16, 2021October 16, 2021 by Jordan Steele

Contents

  • 1Construction and Handling
  • 2Image Quality
  • 3Conclusion
  • 4Image Samples

Manual focus lenses have seen a bit of a resurgence over the past 10 years, and if you’ve been following the site for a while, you know I have a certain fondness for them. It’s been great fun trying out older lenses, some of which are truly excellent optics even today. With the rise of mirrorless cameras over the past decade, nailing focus manually has become easier, making all manual lenses even more attractive. I suppose it’s no surprise then that companies are realizing that in addition to the market for older manual focus lenses, there is a good sized market for brand new manual focus lenses. Voigtländer has seen a resurgence by releasing several excellent primes, many of which I have owned and reviewed on this site.

In the last 5 years, we have also seen the rise of a few small lens manufacturers out of China, which are producing low-cost, yet often very nice quality manual focus lenses. Laowa has made a name for itself by releasing unique optics that also perform very well, and then there are TTArtisan and 7Artisans, who began by releasing small and cheap options of more traditional lenses. Both of these lens makers use DJ Optical to build the lenses (much like Cosina builds both Voigtländer and Zeiss lenses). Some of their early efforts were mediocre, but as the companies gained experience, we have seen the release of several truly excellent lenses. I’ve been very pleased and surprised by the excellent quality of my TTArtisan 11mm fisheye lens (which I have owned in both E mount and RF mount), and today I’m looking at another one of those lenses: the TTArtisan 50mm f/1.4 Aspherical.

The TTArtisan 50mm f/1.4 ASPH for Canon RF

TTArtisan released this lens originally for the Leica M mount, at an affordable price of $369. The lens was highly praised, with many comparing it favorably to such excellent lenses as the Voigtländer 50mm f/1.2 Nokton and even competing on some levels with the legendary Leica 50mm f/1.4 Summilux. After seeing some samples, I was very intrigued by the lens, but that intrigue led to a purchase as soon as TTArtisan ported the lens to many native mirrorless mounts, including Sony E, Nikon Z and the one reviewed here: Canon RF. In addition to the new mounts, TTArtisan adjusted the minimum focus distance to a closer 0.5m (from 0.7m) and lowered the price considerably to just $239. So what do you get for such an affordable price? Quite a lot. Let’s dive in.

Construction and Handling

The build of the TTArtisan 50mm f/1.4 is very clearly modeled after Leica rangefinder lenses, down to copying the font used by Leica. While I would probably prefer that they take on their own design language here, it’s a classic aesthetic and it looks good. The 50mm f/1.4 is constructed entirely of metal and glass. The aluminum body is well machined with tight tolerances and feels very solid. The large manual focus ring has machined grooves to create a ribbed surface that allows for a nice grip. All markings on the lens barrel are engraved and filled with paint. (markings on the front of the lens are printed).

TTArtisan 50mm f/1.4 ASPH has cleanly engraved and filled markings on the lens.

The 50mm f/1.4 is slightly longer than most 50mm lenses due to the interesting lens design, which has the standard double-Gauss design up front with a rear group with high dispersion and aspherical elements to apply additional correction. The lens is very similar in size to something like the Sony/Zeiss 55mm f/1.8. The 50mm f/1.4 is a little heavier than one might think at 457g, with the lens being a solid chunk of glass and metal. While you do feel that weight when the lens is mounted, it still feels right at home on my R5 and R6.

TTArtisan 50mm f/1.4 ASPH for Canon RF

The manual focus ring is perfectly damped to my taste and operates extremely smoothly, with even resistance throughout the throw. The focus throw is long enough to allow for excellent precision in placing focus. There is just the tiniest bit of play in the focus ring when changing focus directions, which is the only thing that hints at the lens being constructed to a slightly lower tolerance than the much more expensive modern manual focus lenses. The thin aperture ring at the front of the lens is also ribbed, but the size of the ring makes it very easy to locate by touch. The aperture ring turns with nice resistance and has very satisfying click stops every half stop from f/1.4 to f/16. Overall, the haptics are excellent.

The TTArtisan 50mm f/1.4 ASPH on the Canon EOS R5

The TTArtisan 50mm f/1.4 comes with a slip on metal lens cap, which works well and stays on nicely. It is also more attractive than most clip-on lens caps. The lens does not come with a lens hood, which I feel would be a welcome addition. Aftermarket rangefinder styled metal hoods can be cheaply had on Amazon and eBay, and will help shield stray light from the lens while looking nice as well. I purchased the hood below for about $6 on eBay and I think it matches the lens very well.

TTArtisan 50mm f/1.4 ASPH with aftermarket metal lens hood

The lens is an all-manual affair, with no lens contacts to pass distance or focus information to the camera body. The lack of EXIF data to the camera does mean that you will need to input the 50mm focal length into the camera to take advantage of the IBIS on the R5 and R6. Like all adapted manual lenses, I get about 3-4 stops of extra handholdability on those cameras.

Continue: Image Quality

Pages: 1 2 3

7 thoughts on “Review: TTArtisan 50mm f/1.4 ASPH (RF Mount)”

  1. Victor says:
    October 17, 2021 at 5:37 pm

    Informative review. Thanks for the efforts!

    Reply
  2. Matthew Kerby says:
    December 19, 2021 at 9:53 pm

    Excellent honest review. I have a few 50’s but just bought one of these after reading the posts on FM and your review here.

    Reply
  3. Gus Wanner says:
    June 28, 2022 at 10:22 am

    Excellent detailed review – the first one I’ve seen for this lens on a Canon R5 & R6. Your pictures do an excellent job of showing the performance of this lens for real-world subject.

    Reply
  4. Damien says:
    January 18, 2023 at 3:52 pm

    Hi Jordan! I bought a copy for R mount and the lens does not fit perfectly tight on the camera, there is a slight play on the lens mount. It’s not much but it’s there and sometimes the lens will move a bit when I’m manual focusing. I also have a sample on E mount with not issues. Do you still own the lens and have you noticed something like that? I’m wondering if it’s an issue with my copy or if it’s broaden to the R mount. Otherwise I love that lens, made so many great images with it.

    Reply
    1. Jordan Steele says:
      January 18, 2023 at 4:13 pm

      In my review, I note, “There is just the tiniest bit of play in the focus ring when changing focus directions, which is the only thing that hints at the lens being constructed to a slightly lower tolerance than the much more expensive modern manual focus lenses. ”

      I believe this is what you’re feeling. If it’s the same thing I feel, it’s not actually in the mount. (I took it apart once to see if there was something loose, or if the rear mount was loose or something…everything was very solid in that regard). The play I believe is between the outer casing and the inner optical casing (if you take the lens off, and hold the base, and turn the extending portion of the lens slightly, you can feel the play there). From what I saw when I disassembled the lens, it is not anything that is a structural issue with the lens. Everything was very solidly attached..it just has a little bit looser tolerances in the fit I believe, though it doesn’t appear to cause any optical problems.

      I feel the play most when focusing in one direction, and then changing focus directions. It’s mildly annoying, but for the price and quality of the lens, I really can’t complain.

      Reply
      1. Damien says:
        January 18, 2023 at 5:05 pm

        Thanks for taking the time to answer. Yes I re-read that part of your review, however I guess it’s a different issue, my copy really does not fit the camera mount perfectly since I can actually move the attached lens sideways by putting some gentle pressure on each side of the lens (and it is enough that I can actually see the lens shifting a tiny bit on the camera mount). However there is no play I can see anywhere on the lens itself if I take it off. The play due to the slightly loose mount will also occurs most often in my case when switching focus direction. Anyway, I’ll try to get the lens exchanged or try another copy some way or another, I just like it too much to give up on it!

        Reply
  5. Clarke jones says:
    March 14, 2023 at 6:14 pm

    Lovely images , thank you Jordan.
    I appreciate your comprehensive real-world testing and your nuanced evaluation of this lens.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Follow Me:

Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on RSSFollow Us on InstagramFollow Us on Mastodon

Most Popular Posts

  • "Full Frame Equivalence" and Why It Doesn't Matter (288)
  • Fuji X-Pro 2 vs. Sony A7 II: Noise Comparison (70)
  • Fuji 56mm f/1.2 vs. Panasonic Leica 42.5mm f/1.2 Nocticron (63)
  • Review: Metabones Speed Booster (Canon FD to Fuji X) (56)
  • Review: Olympus OM-D E-M5 (48)

Recent Comments

  • Peter on A Tripod in the Sky – DJI Air 2S Review
  • Eric Wojtkun on My Favorite Photos of 2022
  • Jordan Steele on “Full Frame Equivalence” and Why It Doesn’t Matter
  • Leon on “Full Frame Equivalence” and Why It Doesn’t Matter
  • Clarke jones on Review: TTArtisan 50mm f/1.4 ASPH (RF Mount)

Archives

©2023 Admiring Light | Theme by SuperbThemes
We use cookies to personalize content and ads and to analyze our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with advertising and analytics partners who may combine it with other information that you’ve provided to them or that they’ve collected from your use of their services. You may consent to the use of cookies or opt out. Accept Reject Read More
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled

Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.

SAVE & ACCEPT