High Resolution Mode
The headlining new feature of the Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II is the High Resolution Mode (henceforth referred to in this article as HR mode). The HR mode takes advantage of the precise control afforded by the excellent in-body image stabilizing system to precisely shift the sensor to capture significantly more data than is generally available with the 16 megapixel sensor. It does this by taking 8 discrete photos and merging them into a single file. First, the camera takes a shot, then shifts the sensor to the side one pixel, then down, then to the other side. This doesn’t add any direct resolution, but instead shifts the Bayer color filter array around such that red, green and blue values are captured for every pixel location, rather than requiring interpolation. This alone increases detail since color interpolation isn’t required like it is for almost all digital cameras. It then follows by shifting the sensor up and to the side, placing the pixel array exactly halfway between pixels both horizontally and vertically. It then completes the shifting to capture full color information at all of THOSE locations.
The result? A true 64 megapixel RAW file with RGB color information at every one of the 64 megapixels. Given the diffraction effects on the small pixels and the resolution capabilities of the lenses, Olympus estimates that there’s only around 40 megapixels of true data here, and as such the JPEG output of this mode is only 40 MP. If you shoot in RAW, you will get the 64MP RAW file (which is over 100MB), an ‘ORI’ RAW file, which is the RAW capture of the first frame in the sequence, and a 40MP JPEG image. So how well does it work? Pretty darn well.
The shot above and to the right was taken in HR mode in RAW, with the Olympus 75-300mm at 75mm. I didn’t think that a lens like this would work very well in this mode, but I was very pleasantly surprised. Below 200mm, it works brilliantly. The 40MP JPEG image produces excellent levels of detail, but the RAW file had even more fine detail. Below is a 100% crop of the final image, showing the level of detail capable in this mode. Note the individual bricks on the mechanical penthouse, then compare the size of the crop to the full image above to get an idea of how much extra detail is capable when using this mode.
I did a head to head test when I first received the camera to test the extra resolution gained by the HR mode, and was similarly impressed. Below are 100% crops using only the out of camera JPEGs, so we’re dealing with 40MP output in this scenario. The image on the right is a 100% crop of the 40MP file, while the image on the left is a 100% crop of the standard 16MP shot, upsized to match the same magnification as the 40MP file. The extra level of detail is astounding. Click to view at full size (the reduced version shown inline is insufficient to see the major differences).
This mode has incredible potential for high-resolution imagery, provided you are using a good lens. But it certainly isn’t going to be useful for a lot of types of shooting. There are three things you need in order to make the HR mode work well: a high quality lens, a rock-solid stable platform, and a scene without motion. This mode requires a very stable tripod with a very stable head, as any vibration in the camera will cause the mode to produce a mushy mess. Macro photography with it is extremely difficult, as even mild air currents or vibrations in the floor of a house can cause enough motion at high magnifications to render the mode useless. Likewise, movement in the scene will result in artifacts, which appear as a diagonal hatch pattern over the areas with motion. This occurs even when shooting longer exposures. You’ll see the first image in the Image Samples collection at the end of the review was taken at 8 seconds in HR mode. To make the shot successful, I had to apply a 1 pixel Gaussian blur to the reflected water and moving sky to eliminate the artifacts. Since these areas were blurred due to motion anyway, it didn’t matter from a subject standpoint, but it did require the extra step. Still, even with the caveats, it’s a mode that can yield wonderful results in many situations.
In-Body Image Stabilization
Olympus has featured in-body image stabilization (IBIS) for a very long time, dating back to the original 4/3 system, though some have worked better than others. The E-M5 Mark II features an improved version of the excellent 5-axis IBIS found in the E-M1. The sensor-shift stabilizer in the E-M5 Mark II turns any lens, even adapted lenses, into image stabilized lenses, and Olympus has the very best IBIS in the industry. The IBIS in the E-M5 II is capable of correcting around 4 stops of hand-shake, which is rather remarkable. This can enable handholding shots at 40mm (80mm equivalent) at a shutter speed of 1/5 second or so. The shot to the right was taken at 1/4 second at 28mm and remains sharp. I didn’t have time to change settings for this shot, as the look lasted only for a second, and I was headed up the stairs. I wasn’t planning on taking a photo, but was relieved to find the shot had come out successfully despite the very slow shutter speed.
On the down side, the E-M5 II’s IBIS is also susceptible to shutter shock like the E-M1. When shutter speeds are between 1/30s and 1/80s, or when using very long lenses like the 75-300mm, the camera can have induced blur from the IBIS system due to the mechanical shutter. With the E-M5 II, there are two options: turn on the provided anti-shock feature, or use ‘silent mode’ which utilizes fully electronic shutter for the shot. Both do a good job of eliminating the shutter shock issue.
The addition of IBIS is extremely valuable for a wide range of shooting applications, from dim light photography at lower ISOs to hand-holding shots at slow shutter speeds to capture motion of the subject while keeping the background sharp.
In-Camera Keystone Correction
Another excellent feature that is new to the E-M5 II was also recently given to E-M1 owners via firmware update. Olympus has made it possible to do in-camera perspective correction, to eliminate keystoning that can occur when tilting the camera up or down, most often when photographing architecture. This, of course, only affects the JPEG output, as RAW captures always remain untouched, but I found it useful even when shooting RAW.
The keystone correction is activated in page 2 of the main menu, and two perspective correction controls appear on-screen, for use with the main dials. Note that it’s a bit tricky to make quick exposure adjustments when using the keystone correction since the main dials are taken over, so it’s easier to get your exposure correct in advance, then switch on the correction. Then all you need to do is move the dials to correct either vertical or horizontal perspective correction. You can also use the four-way buttons to shift the final composition to include what you need from the corrected frame, while a key in the corner shows the area of the corrected frame that will be captured. Unfortunately, you can’t correct both horizontal and vertical perspective simultaneously. The correction works very well, and corrected JPEGs can achieve that nice straight line look right out of camera.
I mentioned that I also found it useful when using RAW, so let me explain. I shoot a lot of city and architecture photos, and since there are (as of this writing) no mirrorless tilt-shift lenses to enable perspective correction optically, I do a lot of keystone correction in post. Normally, these adjustments can be fairly minor, and it’s not hard to compose with this in mind. However, there are times where you’re tilting the camera up significantly. When corrected, these images will lose data at the bottom edge. As a result, you need to figure out how loose the composition needs to be to have the final image still contain everything you need in the final image. This can be challenging with extreme corrections, but using the in-camera correction tool will give you a RAW image that you know can be corrected.
Of course, the E-M5 Mark II features Olympus’ full featured Wi-Fi capabilities that have appeared in their cameras from the past two years. Wi-Fi is one of the features I miss most when shooting with my original E-M5, so it’s a welcome addition to the new camera.
Like the E-M1 and E-P5, the E-M5 Mark II has all the standard Wi-Fi features, including remote image transfer, remote shooting and GPS tagging of images. For my own shooting, the transfer of images is the most useful, as I can quickly view high-resolution images on my phone or table, enabling further editing and quick sharing while on the go. I also occasionally use remote shooting to get a good view when the camera is in an awkward position, though this is less needed on the E-M5 II than on many other cameras due to the fully articulating screen.
Wi-Fi is established by scanning a QR code with your phone or tablet (manual setup is available too), then following the on-screen prompts. Setup went smoothly for me, and image transfer in conjunction with the competent RAW editing features on the camera made sharing a breeze. Remote shooting works fairly well also, with most major settings available right from within the mobile app.
There are quite a few long-standing Olympus features that are, of course, present on this camera as well. Worth mentioning is the outstanding Live Time and Live Bulb features, which show a live developing preview of the image during long exposures. It’s a feature I use a fair bit on my E-M5 and works just as well on the E-M5 II. Olympus has added a new feature in the same set, which is Live Comp. This allows you to take a reference exposure image, and then let the camera check for new areas of brightness over the course of subsequent exposures. Effectively, it allows you to expose for the background and then do subsequent longer exposures to composite into the frame, such as painting with light, or something as simple as fireworks. It’s nice to see Olympus continue to innovate in this area.
21 thoughts on “Review: Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II”
Quality review as always Jordan.
When you say C-AF is very close to the E-M1, are you meaning the E-M1 with the new v3.0 firmware, or with earlier versions?
I’m comparing to the E-M1 when I tested it, which was shortly after release.
translated to swedish it says you tested it after you whas released from jaile 🙂
The HR mode is limited, of course. But is it as limited as some say? Here’s a landscape scenario: a lake, a speedboat, lovely green hills in the background. A light breeze is making the lake heave and the boat is moving. You take the picture in HR mode. The lake has that weird, greasy look and the boat is a smeared disaster. What will you do? In post, take the ORI file, and enlarge is to the same pixel dimensions as your HR file. Select the ORI lake, copy it, lay it on top of the HR file and there it is. A nice lake with a good-looking speedboat. The hills have nice DR and crispness and the big file may be good enough to print large. You could use the same technique to paste over a wind-smeared bush. You won’t be able to use this when shooting a forest in a wind storm but my point is that the usefulness of HR may be broader than some think. Having never used this camera, I’d appreciate critique on my speculation, especially as I probably will buy the camera.
If buying now would you buy the Em1 or the EM5ii?
Many thanks for the very informative review. I wonder if you were able to use the WiFi to make High Res exposures? It seemed to me that this would be a great way to minimize camera vibration, but I could not get it to work using the Olympus app on my iPhone. Do you any way this can be done?
I also was unable to get the camera to shoot a Hi-Res photo using remote control.
“… compose while looking to the side of the camera, which feels awkward to me”
Absolutely. That is why I returned the Panasonic G1 way back when. I stopped using the fully articulated screen altogether as it was so odd to look beside the camera, jikes.
Excellent review. I think the mail reason for offering PD auto focus on the EM5II would be to enable the use of the older Four Thirds system lenses on the EM5II. See Robin Wong’s review where he tries out Four Thirds lenses on the EM1. Adding a bigger sensor would have been ideal. I suspect that Olympus will continue to incrementally improve the camera, much like Apple and others do with their products, to get users to upgrade at regular intervals.
Hi there, good work.
Also, how can I have your original RAW file or JPEG in HiRes mode? It would be create if you can send the files.
Thanks! I’m sorry, but while I occasionally share full size images for my reviews most of the images here are my personal work…I just use the gear I’m reviewing as I would for regular personal shooting to see how it works for me, and I don’t give full size of those away.
As always, I appreciate your reviews.
For my two cents, on the handling, I’ve had an interesting experience with the EM5 MkII. The front dial is positioned on the flat top plate, and I have to shift my grip uncomfortably with the pro lenses. Overall, the MkII feels out of balance with the pro lenses (12-40 and 40-150), but perfect with the smaller primes (20mm, 75mm). This is the reverse of the EM1 – pro lenses feel great, but the small primes feel a little lost on the larger body. The add on grip helps, but it’s an awkward solution. I’m actually trading in my MkII for a used EM1 after “upgrading.”
Well you know what? I have the original E-M5, it feels good with 75mm with or without the grip, 15/25mm is a bit too small with the add-on grip, 12-40 and 40-150 PRO certainly need the grip for extra handhold position, as well as the shutter button being placed on the right spot, place where your last 3 fingers hold the body and a place where your pointing finger place nicely on the shutter button.
Totally agree with you when E-M1 with PRO Zoom, the deep grip is fantastic, but not so on the other small primes. To me, E-M1 overal has better ergonomic than the E-M5 with lens over 300g, that is where balance found just right.
Just bought omd em5
mkii. Brilliant camera I just upgraded to 2.2. Great review
After installing firmware update 2.2 yesterday, the EFV eye sensor only works to shut the display off.
When I turn the camera on with eye sensor enabled the display works, when i put my eye or a finger in front of the eye sensor the camera switches to the EVF but in no way will it switch back to the displayau5g when i take the eye or the finger away.
Did anyone else notice this misbehaviour?
Please, excuse me for the typos, I have been too hectic in writing my post.
The correct message is the following:
OM-D E-M5 Mark II firmware update 2.2 eye sensor problems.
After installing firmware update 2.2 yesterday on my Olympus OM-D E-M5, coming from 2.0, the EFV eye sensor only works to shut the display off.
When I turn the camera on with eye sensor enabled, the display works, when i put my eye or a finger in front of the eye sensor the camera turns the display off and switches to the EVF as expected, but in no way will it switch back to the display view when i take the eye or the finger away.
Did anyone else notice this misbehaviour?
Many thanks in advance
Hello, it’s possible to see a comparison between e-m5 II and a6000 image quality? (like a6000 vs a7 II)
or just your impressions thanks!
Thank you for a great review. I will hold onto the original OMD EM5 …. Until the iteration with a newer sensor.
Thanks Jordan for creating very good content.
If you have to choose between EM5 ii or EM1 (old model) in 2017, which one will go with?
I am planning to buy either of those 2. I checked, both feel good in hands, EM1 feels like pro body and received updates via firmware upgrade.