Admiring Light
Menu
  • Home
  • Review Index
  • Shop Talk
  • Technique and Vision
  • Opinion
  • Portfolio
  • Site Index
  • About
    • Privacy Policy
Menu

Review: Sony FE 50mm f/1.8

Posted on May 28, 2016November 13, 2019 by Jordan Steele

Contents

  • 1Construction and Handling
  • 2Image Quality
  • 3Conclusion
  • 4Sample Images

Sony has been cranking out new lenses in 2016, with a total of 5 new lenses announced over the first 5 months of the year.  In addition to the long-awaited fast aperture G Master line, Sony also released two options that were more modest in aperture: the 70-300mm f/4-5.6 and this lens: the Sony FE 50mm f/1.8.  Sony already has a Zeiss branded f/1.8 normal prime in the truly excellent Zeiss FE 55mm f/1.8, but the 50mm is intended to fill the role of Sony’s ‘nifty fifty:’ a low-cost lens with good image quality that provides an inexpensive way to get a faster lens.  While the $250 price tag of the 50mm f/1.8 is a bit higher than the 50mm f/1.8 lenses from Canon and Nikon, it’s only a quarter of the asking price for Sony’s premium 55mm f/1.8.  Let’s find out how it stacks up.

Edit, September 2019: Since this review was first published, I have obtained a new copy of the FE 50mm f/1.8, and have now had a chance to evaluate the lens using the latest firmware from Sony, v.03, which contained significant improvements to the autofocus of the lens. New observations that concern updates from the firmware update are in italics.  The original text from the review is left intact or with strikeout, so the reader may read the original review conclusions.

The Sony FE 50mm f/1.8 on the Sony A7 II
The Sony FE 50mm f/1.8 on the Sony A7 II

If you’re not familiar with my reviews, I review from a real world shooting perspective. You won’t find lens charts or resolution numbers here. There are plenty of other sites that cover those. I review products on how they act for me as a photographic tool.

Construction and Handling

The Sony FE 50mm f/1.8 is intended to be a low-cost lens, so as you might expect, the feel of the lens exterior isn’t quite as premium as most of the FE lenses.  However, much like the 28-70mm f/3.5-5.6, the 50mm f/1.8 is quite well constructed for what it is.  The lens has an all-plastic construction, and while the plastic doesn’t have the durable finish that the GM lenses have, it is still a tightly assembled lens that feels quite well-built considering the price.  The lens does have a metal bayonet mount, and though there is no flex anywhere in the lens body, nor any slop in the manual focus ring, the lens does belie it’s cheaper construction simply due to heft.  The lens is so light that it almost feels hollow. It’s a crazy light lens.  When mounted to the body, it almost feels like you don’t have a lens mounted, which is great for a lightweight walkaround kit.

fe_50_hood
The FE 50mm f/1.8 with hood mounted

As such, the lens handles beautifully on any camera, with plenty of clearance from the lens to the grip.  While lightweight, it’s not super small, but it’s reasonable in size given the focal length and aperture. It’s roughly the same diameter as the FE 55mm f/1.8, if not slightly fatter.  It’s about 1cm shorter than that lens, however. The FE 50mm f/1.8 comes with a standard cylindrical plastic lens hood that mounts and reverses for storage using a front bayonet mount. The hood locked easily and without slop, but the detent holding it in place was a bit weak, making it a bit prone to shifting from time to time. Edit, November, 2019: It is worth noting that on my personal copy of the lens, the lens hood locks tightly and securely.

The manual focus ring is a plastic rubberized ribbed ring that moves smoothly and without any unwanted displacement.  The damping is fairly light, however: another casualty of hitting a price point.

The FE 50mm f/1.8 next to the much more expensive FE 55mm f/1.8
The FE 50mm f/1.8 next to the much more expensive FE 55mm f/1.8

Autofocus

Edit: In 2017, Sony released firmware version 3 for the FE 50mm f/1.8, which included rather significant updates to the autofocus of the lens.  On my A7 III, the difference with the new firmware is night and day from my experience with the original firmware on my A7 II.  The lens focuses reasonably quickly and very surely in a wide variety of lighting conditions.  While shooting in very dim conditions at small apertures will still cause AF to slow considerably, the lens still finds focus quite well.  The only area where it still does focus somewhat poorly is in backlit situations, where the FE55mm finds focus easily, but the FE 50mm struggles. For everyday shooting, while still a bit slower than something like the FE 55mm f/1.8, the new firmware makes the FE 50mm f/1.8 perfectly usable for daily use.  Alas, noise is still present when focusing because of the type of motor used. The original text that discussed the autofocus when this review was originally published is below.

The biggest cost cutting casualty, however, is the autofocus system.  Sony has put in a standard DC motor for the linear extension focusing group of the FE 50mm f/1.8.  As such, the lens focuses fairly slowly, and the autofocus motor is quite audible. The front element moves in and out from the lens body during focusing, so it’s probably a good idea to keep the hood affixed to avoid accidental contact with the focusing group.

The speed of the autofocus truly is a detriment to the lens.  It’s the slowest focusing FE lens I’ve used, as it takes a good while to obtain focus, especially in dimmer light. While wide aperture shooting outdoors allows for reasonable focus speeds, once you start stopping down, the lens also struggles to find focus sometimes.  Since the lens focuses at working aperture, when shooting at an f-stop like f/11 or f/16, the lens can slow down considerably, and sometimes accuracy suffers due to the deep depth of field at these apertures as well. In all, it was a frustrating experience using autofocus with this lens in many situations; it is by far the worst thing about the lens.

Continue: Image Quality

Pages: 1 2 3

9 thoughts on “Review: Sony FE 50mm f/1.8”

  1. Pingback: Sony 24-70mm Gm review by Digitalrev: “it’s stupendously good” | sonyalpharumors
  2. Michael Jardeen says:
    May 29, 2016 at 7:32 pm

    Your review is spot on with mine. I got mine the 1st day they were delivered and returned it after 2 week. Perhaps if Sony does a firmware update to allow Phase Detection in the A7II and older I would reconsider, but as it they should have spent an extra $50 to provide a better AF. I was so irritated to have to return it.

    Reply
    1. Joel says:
      August 29, 2016 at 1:45 pm

      Agree with your frustration, it sucks to be hampered by such an obvious drawback, and I wish this was a first for Sony. However, I think it is a bit more complicated than a $50 upgraded part. The 50 1.8 is the only FE lens (to my knowledge) that does use an SLR design (double guass—like most nifty fifties) and moves the entire optical component instead of using internal focus. Moving that much mass in a CDAF system is difficult. Fuji’s original 35mm f1.4 struggled as well for the same reason I believe. Certainly a better motor would help but even the top shelf GM 85mm (which is internal focus but uses much heavier elements) is relatively slow.

      I hope you’re right and improvements in Sony’s PDAF system will yield acceptable results in the new low- mid-range A7 models. For now I’m sticking with the FE 55mm. I waiting patiently and snagged my copy (very good) for ~$500. Still much more than the 50 but closer…

      Reply
      1. Aaron says:
        September 9, 2016 at 2:31 pm

        You can’t paint all double Gauss lenses as a SLR designs, especially when it comes to 50mm. There are quite a few 50mm dougle Gauss rangefinder lenses, plenty of RF double Gauss lenses at 35mm and 90mm as well. Obviously a lot of double Gauss SLR lenses as well, but that doesn’t make it an “SLR design.” A double Gauss makes a lot of sense for RF flange distances between 35-90mm. I think there were even double Gauss 28mm lenses (Canon LTM IIRC), something you could never pull off on an SLR.

        Reply
  3. Radek says:
    September 20, 2016 at 8:35 am

    Quick update – after latest firmware update on 09/09 autofocus is much better (although not perfect). Tested on a6k, continuous focus works quite good, singiel is improved and works “ok”.

    Reply
  4. Pingback: Review: Sony Zeiss FE 50mm f/1.4 ZA Planar T* - Admiring Light
  5. Pingback: ???????FE??????? FE 50mm F1.8 ?????????????????? | ?????????????
  6. Pingback: ??? FE 50mm F1.8??????????????AF???????????? | ?????????????
  7. Pingback: Sony FE 50mm f/1.8 Lens Review | GearOpen

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Follow Me:

Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on RSSFollow Us on InstagramFollow Us on Mastodon

Most Popular Posts

  • "Full Frame Equivalence" and Why It Doesn't Matter (288)
  • Fuji X-Pro 2 vs. Sony A7 II: Noise Comparison (70)
  • Fuji 56mm f/1.2 vs. Panasonic Leica 42.5mm f/1.2 Nocticron (63)
  • Review: Metabones Speed Booster (Canon FD to Fuji X) (56)
  • Review: Olympus OM-D E-M5 (48)

Recent Comments

  • Eric Wojtkun on My Favorite Photos of 2022
  • Jordan Steele on “Full Frame Equivalence” and Why It Doesn’t Matter
  • Leon on “Full Frame Equivalence” and Why It Doesn’t Matter
  • Clarke jones on Review: TTArtisan 50mm f/1.4 ASPH (RF Mount)
  • Anonymous on Sony A7 III vs. A7 II – Noise Comparison

Archives

©2023 Admiring Light | Theme by SuperbThemes
We use cookies to personalize content and ads and to analyze our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with advertising and analytics partners who may combine it with other information that you’ve provided to them or that they’ve collected from your use of their services. You may consent to the use of cookies or opt out. Accept Reject Read More
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled

Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.

SAVE & ACCEPT