Admiring Light
Menu
  • Home
  • Review Index
  • Shop Talk
  • Technique and Vision
  • Opinion
  • Portfolio
  • Site Index
  • About
    • Privacy Policy
Menu

Review: Sony FE 50mm f/1.8

Posted on May 28, 2016November 13, 2019 by Jordan Steele

Contents

  • 1Construction and Handling
  • 2Image Quality
  • 3Conclusion
  • 4Sample Images

Image Quality

While the autofocus of the FE 50mm f/1.8 is disappointing, I can’t really say that about the optics.  The lens, in most situations, is extremely capable.

Sharpness

Being a low-cost consumer-grade lens, I didn’t really expect perfect image quality out of the FE 50mm f/1.8. I didn’t get perfect image quality either, but what I did get is very good quality.  The lens shows some minor softness at f/1.8, especially when focused very close up, but at more moderate distances beyond a meter, it actually produces good central resolution, and even maintains that towards the edges. What’s interesting to note is that at f/1.8, there’s a mid-zone dip in resolution around 1/3 of the way from the center, where it shows notably softening. It’s actually sharper at the edges than it is just outside the center.  The extreme corners are also soft at f/1.8, but overall it’s not bad at all.  For most shooting, it’s definitely very usable wide open.  Stopping down to just f/2.2 brings sharpness up considerably, though, and the images get a bit of bite. By f/2.8, the lens produces images that are very sharp almost to the extreme corners, and even those corners are quite good.  By f/5.6, it’s simply tack sharp corner to corner.  It’s a very impressive performance.  While not quite on the level of the FE 55mm f/1.8 when shot at wide apertures, stopped down it begins to rival the sharpness from that great lens. For a 100% edge crop of the shot below, click here.

bridges_reflection
Railroad Bridge – Sony A7 II with Sony FE 50mm f/1.8 @ f/8

Bokeh

Often, one of the things that gets left out of the design process with inexpensive optics is a focus on good out of focus character, but thankfully Sony has not gone that route with the FE 50mm f/1.8.  Out of focus areas are rendered with a beautiful softness, and specular highlights, while not perfectly neutral, are predominantly free of any bright ring outlining. A bit of a cat’s eye shape can be seen when shooting at wide apertures, near the corner of the frame, but I don’t find it distracting in most situations.  The seven-bladed aperture keeps highlights relatively round until f/5.6, where the heptagon shape begins to be visible in specular highlights.  I was quite pleased with the bokeh from the FE 50mm f/1.8

Tree - Sony A7 II with Sony FE 50mm f/1.8 @ f/1.8
Tree – Sony A7 II with Sony FE 50mm f/1.8 @ f/1.8

Color, Contrast and Chromatic Aberration

The FE 50mm f/1.8 doesn’t disappoint either with regards to color and contrast.  The lens renders colors richly with a neutral color cast.  Contrast is also excellent, right from f/1.8, as you can see in the image above.  The end result is that images look rich and vibrant. This behavior is probably the biggest surprise out of this lens.  It’s a cheap lens that renders like an expensive lens.

While lateral chromatic aberration is very well controlled, I can’t say the same about longitudinal CA.  Greenish blue fringes are quite visible when shooting at wide apertures, when just out off focus, while a magenta fringe appears on areas just closer than the focus point. This also can affect bokeh in some instances, with white specular highlights displaying a green ring around them.  It’s not a major issue in the field, but it’s definitely visible, and may require correction depending on the shot.

Distortion, Flare and Vignetting

The FE 50mm f/1.8 continues it’s very good optical performance with good control of distortion and vignetting.  The 50mm f/1.8 shows a very minor amount of barrel distortion that is negligible in more situations.  Only in architectural shots where straight lines at the edges of the frame are an integral part of the composition will some minor distortion correction be required. Like all fast aperture lenses, the 50mm f/1.8 shows a bit of corner darkening at f/1.8, which eases somewhat at f/2.8.  By f/4, though, there’s essentially no field-relevant vignetting left to be had.

Sunshine - Sony A7 II with Sony FE 50mm f/1.8 @ f/11
Sunshine – Sony A7 II with Sony FE 50mm f/1.8 @ f/11

As you might expect from a lower-cost lens, the FE 50mm’s lens coatings aren’t the greatest in the world, but I actually expected a worse performance with regards to flare.  In most situations with bright light in the frame, there is only minor loss of contrast and minimal ghosting.  There can be some multicolored flare that surrounds the sun when it’s in the frame, but severe ghosting only occurs with the sun in a very specific location, which can throw rather impressive pink and green ghosts across the frame. As you can see from the shot above, it can certainly impact an image in the right circumstance, but it’s far from a terrible performance.

Continue: Conclusion and Image Samples

Pages: 1 2 3

9 thoughts on “Review: Sony FE 50mm f/1.8”

  1. Pingback: Sony 24-70mm Gm review by Digitalrev: “it’s stupendously good” | sonyalpharumors
  2. Michael Jardeen says:
    May 29, 2016 at 7:32 pm

    Your review is spot on with mine. I got mine the 1st day they were delivered and returned it after 2 week. Perhaps if Sony does a firmware update to allow Phase Detection in the A7II and older I would reconsider, but as it they should have spent an extra $50 to provide a better AF. I was so irritated to have to return it.

    Reply
    1. Joel says:
      August 29, 2016 at 1:45 pm

      Agree with your frustration, it sucks to be hampered by such an obvious drawback, and I wish this was a first for Sony. However, I think it is a bit more complicated than a $50 upgraded part. The 50 1.8 is the only FE lens (to my knowledge) that does use an SLR design (double guass—like most nifty fifties) and moves the entire optical component instead of using internal focus. Moving that much mass in a CDAF system is difficult. Fuji’s original 35mm f1.4 struggled as well for the same reason I believe. Certainly a better motor would help but even the top shelf GM 85mm (which is internal focus but uses much heavier elements) is relatively slow.

      I hope you’re right and improvements in Sony’s PDAF system will yield acceptable results in the new low- mid-range A7 models. For now I’m sticking with the FE 55mm. I waiting patiently and snagged my copy (very good) for ~$500. Still much more than the 50 but closer…

      Reply
      1. Aaron says:
        September 9, 2016 at 2:31 pm

        You can’t paint all double Gauss lenses as a SLR designs, especially when it comes to 50mm. There are quite a few 50mm dougle Gauss rangefinder lenses, plenty of RF double Gauss lenses at 35mm and 90mm as well. Obviously a lot of double Gauss SLR lenses as well, but that doesn’t make it an “SLR design.” A double Gauss makes a lot of sense for RF flange distances between 35-90mm. I think there were even double Gauss 28mm lenses (Canon LTM IIRC), something you could never pull off on an SLR.

        Reply
  3. Radek says:
    September 20, 2016 at 8:35 am

    Quick update – after latest firmware update on 09/09 autofocus is much better (although not perfect). Tested on a6k, continuous focus works quite good, singiel is improved and works “ok”.

    Reply
  4. Pingback: Review: Sony Zeiss FE 50mm f/1.4 ZA Planar T* - Admiring Light
  5. Pingback: ???????FE??????? FE 50mm F1.8 ?????????????????? | ?????????????
  6. Pingback: ??? FE 50mm F1.8??????????????AF???????????? | ?????????????
  7. Pingback: Sony FE 50mm f/1.8 Lens Review | GearOpen

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Follow Me:

Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on TwitterFollow Us on RSSFollow Us on Instagram

Most Popular Posts

  • "Full Frame Equivalence" and Why It Doesn't Matter (286)
  • Fuji X-Pro 2 vs. Sony A7 II: Noise Comparison (70)
  • Fuji 56mm f/1.2 vs. Panasonic Leica 42.5mm f/1.2 Nocticron (63)
  • Review: Metabones Speed Booster (Canon FD to Fuji X) (56)
  • Review: Olympus OM-D E-M5 (48)

Recent Comments

  • Don McConnell on Review: Laowa 15mm f/4.5 Zero-D Shift
  • Scott on Review: Laowa 15mm f/4.5 Zero-D Shift
  • Logan ross on Canon RF 70-200mm f/4L IS vs. Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS
  • Tobie on Review: Panasonic Lumix G 25mm f/1.7
  • Carl Zeller on Using Manual Focus Lenses on Mirrorless Cameras

Archives

©2021 Admiring Light | Theme by SuperbThemes
We use cookies to personalize content and ads and to analyze our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with advertising and analytics partners who may combine it with other information that you’ve provided to them or that they’ve collected from your use of their services. You may consent to the use of cookies or opt out. Accept Reject Read More
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled

Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.

Non-necessary

Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.