Admiring Light
Menu
  • Home
  • Review Index
  • Shop Talk
  • Technique and Vision
  • Opinion
  • Portfolio
  • Site Index
  • About
    • Privacy Policy
Menu

Review: Fujifilm X-M1

Posted on August 13, 2013February 6, 2014 by Jordan Steele

Contents

  • 1Body and Ergonomics
  • 2Rear Screen
  • 3Operation and Menus
  • 4Focus Peaking
  • 5Autofocus and Performance
  • 6Flash
  • 7Key Features: Wi-Fi
  • 8In-Camera RAW Conversion
  • 9Film Simulations and Advanced Filters
  • 10Other Items of Note
  • 11Image Quality: Resolution, Dynamic Range and Color
  • 12Noise
  • 13JPEG Quality
  • 14Movie Mode
  • 15Conclusion
  • 16Image Samples

Conclusion

Pros

  • Exceptional dynamic range and rich color lead to great depth to the images
  • Excellent noise control, offering low noise images throughout the ISO range
  • Short shutter lag
  • Overall camera responsiveness is improved over previous X-Series cameras
  • Autofocus is accurate and has acceptable speed
  • Very compact and attractive body with very well laid out controls, including excellent dual dial system
  • Rear LCD is high resolution with good color and sharpness, and has tilt capability over an impressive range of motion
  • Focus Peaking works very well and can be switched on and off rapidly with the rear command dial
  • Built-In flash works quite well
  • Wi-Fi capability makes transferring images to your smartphone quick and easy
  • Great JPEG output
  • Fun!

Cons

  • Body feels cheap in the hand due to smooth plastics throughout the construction
  • No viewfinder, nor the option to add an external viewfinder
  • Autofocus still lags the competition in speed by a decent margin
  • Fewer film simulations to choose from vs. X-E1 and X-Pro 1
  • Tripod mount is too close to battery/SD card door
  • No touch-screen capability
  • Wi-Fi mode is limited and doesn’t have the ability for remote camera control
  • Geotagging could use some refinement
  • No dedicated focus mode switch
  • Can’t view vertical images using the whole screen on playback.
  • Replacement of shutter speed dial with Mode dial may rankle some people, and removes the ability to see your settings at a glance with the camera off.

Fujifilm X-M1

The Fujifilm X-M1 is a unique camera. It’s a mid-tier priced mirrorless camera, coming in at $699 body only, or $799 in a kit with the XC 16-50mm zoom. It has a lower end build feel, but an extremely high-end imaging pipeline. The combination leaves one with some mixed emotions. I wish it felt as solid in the hand as something like my OM-D or Panasonic GX1. At the same time, the controls are laid out extremely well, the rear LCD is very nice, and they’ve improved the performance over the previous X-Series cameras in a way that eliminates almost all of the small annoyances that still remained with those cameras. Then they’ve thrown in integrated Wi-Fi and packaged it in a very small body.

I didn’t think I was going to like the X-M1 that much. I really prefer to use an EVF where possible, though I’m not completely averse to using a camera without one. They modified the truly outstanding old-school control scheme, and I didn’t think I would like that at all. Then, when I picked up the body, it felt quite plasticky. Yet, as I used the camera, I found myself really, really enjoying it. It’s by far the most responsive X-series ILC to date, the small size and outstanding image quality, combined with a well thought out control scheme has made me quite happy to grab the X-M1 and go shoot. Focus peaking works very well on the rear LCD, I enjoy using Wi-Fi to quickly share high quality photos, and certainly, the image quality seriously impresses. I actually found myself enjoying the X-M1 more than my X-E1 in most situations.

It’s not all puppies and rainbows, of course. The autofocus speed still noticeably trails its competitors, though Fuji has made good strides over the past year to bring it up to a speed that is generally acceptable for most shooting. I missed the quick switch for focus modes and I do still wish it had an option for an external EVF. This is also the type of camera that one would expect to have a touch screen, and it’s a feature that Fuji probably should have added.

In all, though, I think the X-M1 is a very fun, small camera that packs some serious punch and has excellent external controls. It could have been phenomenal, had Fuji decided not to skimp on the body materials, but if you value control and image quality above all, the X-M1 doesn’t disappoint.

Image Samples

Click on an image to view it larger

Egret in the Mist - Fujifilm X-M1 with Fujinon XC 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OIS
Egret in the Mist – Fujifilm X-M1 with Fujinon XC 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OIS @ ISO 400
Hayden Falls - Fujifilm X-M1 with Fujinon XC 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OIS
Hayden Falls – Fujifilm X-M1 with Fujinon XC 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OIS @ ISO 200
Roots - Fujifilm X-M1 with Fujinon XC 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OIS
Roots – Fujifilm X-M1 with Fujinon XC 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OIS @ ISO 1250
- Fujifilm X-M1 with Rokinon 8mm f/2.8 Fisheye
Statehouse Rotunda – Fujifilm X-M1 with Rokinon 8mm f/2.8 Fisheye @ ISO 2500
- Fujifilm X-M1 with Rokinon 85mm f/1.4
Girl – Fujifilm X-M1 with Rokinon 85mm f/1.4 @ ISO 800
Hayden Falls - Fujifilm X-M1 with Fujinon XC 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OIS
Hayden Falls – Fujifilm X-M1 with Fujinon XC 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OIS @ ISO 200
Lost Boat - Fujifilm X-M1 with Fujinon XC 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OIS
Lost Boat – Fujifilm X-M1 with Fujinon XC 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OIS @ ISO 800
Bee - Fujifilm X-M1 with Canon FD 70-210 f/4
Bee – Fujifilm X-M1 with Canon FD 70-210 f/4 @ ISO 800
Ohio Statehouse - Fujifilm X-M1 with Fujinon XC 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OIS
Ohio Statehouse – Fujifilm X-M1 with Fujinon XC 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OIS @ ISO 1600
Water Plants - Fujifilm X-M1 with Fujinon XC 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OIS
Water Plants – Fujifilm X-M1 with Fujinon XC 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OIS @ ISO 200
Boats Under Broad Street - Fujifilm X-M1 with Fujinon XC 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OIS
Boats Under Broad Street – Fujifilm X-M1 with Fujinon XC 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OIS @ ISO 400
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5

20 thoughts on “Review: Fujifilm X-M1”

  1. Pingback: My Full X-M1 Review at Admiring Light
  2. carl says:
    August 13, 2013 at 1:25 pm

    A very useful review; thanks.

    One question: for the photographs displayed from the X-M1, did you use any post-processing? And if so, how long did you typically spend on a photograph?

    Reply
    1. Jordan Steele says:
      August 13, 2013 at 2:00 pm

      There is some post processing on all the shots, as they are all from RAW. Many have very minor edits, such as contrast and saturation adjustment, others have a little more work. Since I need to see how RAW files hold up to all sorts of different processing (it’s one of the things that can really separate camera sensors), I simply shoot and process in my normal workflow. I usually spend about 2-3 minutes per image, though a few take a bit longer. Here’s a breakdown of images, starting with the two on the Image Quality page. All images were processed in Lightroom 5.2 Release Candidate and Photoshop CS6.

      – Sunrise over Columbus: Heavy shadow and highlight compression in Lightroom (blacks +36, Shadows +100, Exposure +2/3 stop, highlights around -30. Color and contrast adjustment after RAW processing.
      – Ohio Statehouse: minor color and contrast adjustment after RAW processing.

      On this page:
      – Egret in the Mist: Heavily cropped (this is about a 4.5 MP crop of the full 16MP image), processed in Color Efex Pro 4 with the Infrared Film preset, tweaked to taste.
      – Hayden Falls: Minor color and contrast adjustment after RAW processing.
      – Roots: Pretty heavy editing with Color Efex Pro to enhance color, provide more subtle contrasts and a little glow.
      – Statehouse Rotunda: minor color and contrast adjustment after RAW processing.
      – Girl – Almost straight out of camera – maybe slight additional saturation.
      – Hayden Falls – minor color and contrast adjustment after RAW processing.
      – Lost boat: Black and White conversion in Nik Silver Efex Pro 2 with selective color masking done in Photoshop
      – Bee: Combination of two exposures (one focused on the flower, the other focused on the bee (though the same composition for both exposures)) – minor color and contrast adjustment after RAW processing.
      – Ohio Statehouse: color and contrast adjustment after RAW processing, additional processing in Color Efex for a little ethereal feel.
      – Water Plants: Sunlight filter in Nik Color Efex to give warmth and modulate contrast. I cloned out a few bubbles in the water as well.
      – Boats Under Broad Street: B&W conversion in Nik Silver Efex Pro 2.

      Reply
  3. cosinaphile says:
    August 15, 2013 at 11:44 am

    a very enjoyable review , as an xe1 owner i appreciated that you took time to explain the value of the customizable jpeg engine … its a valuable feature imho….. sadly the finish seems cheap though build is good … i wish a firmware update could unlock the xe1 camera during writing , but it may just be a case of processing power , in which case unlikely.

    Reply
  4. Bill Crelin says:
    August 15, 2013 at 12:50 pm

    Jordan,
    As always, wonderful shots and thorough overview of the new Fuji. I follow your posts over at Fredmiranda as well and to my eye your fuji shots always seem to appear ‘silky’ for want of a better word and the oly photos are quite sharp and acute but not at all in a bad way. Am I reading too much into this or is this perhaps the ‘Fuji look’ folks refer to on occasion ? . Thanks for the time in putting these helpful reviews together

    bc

    Reply
    1. Jordan Steele says:
      August 16, 2013 at 8:07 am

      Yeah, a lot of that is that ‘depth’ that I talk about the Fuji images having. They’re just a little better in color/contrast and smoothness of transitions. Really nice files. The Oly files are generally a little crisper with a sharper contrast cutoff, though both are easily capable of excellent images.

      Reply
  5. Pingback: Review: Fujifilm Fujinon XC 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OIS @ Admiring Light
  6. Pingback: Fujifilm X-M1 Camera Review | Daily Camera News
  7. Jacob Freeze says:
    August 19, 2013 at 7:31 am

    These are flat out the best photos I ever saw in a camera review, and that’s mostly the photographer, not the camera, although the M1 is a very fine little machine.

    Reply
    1. Jordan Steele says:
      August 19, 2013 at 11:38 am

      Wow, thanks! I appreciate that!

      Reply
  8. Pingback: Fuji X-M1 at Admiring Light | Camera Reviews
  9. Frank says:
    September 2, 2013 at 3:10 am

    Very nice and detailled review, thanks.
    You mention the “plastic” feel of the camera. Is the top deck plate made of plastic, or metal (what it looks like on the pictures)?
    Thanks.

    Reply
    1. Jordan Steele says:
      September 2, 2013 at 8:16 am

      The entire exterior of the camera, except for the two dials on top and the power switch, is plastic. It’s well assembled plastic, but it’s definitely plastic.

      Reply
  10. Kjell Ossson says:
    September 22, 2013 at 4:51 am

    Just found you site “by accident” and I must say that I really appreciate the Fuji X-reviews I have read so far!

    I would rank you in top along Dpreview and a few others!

    There are enough so called reviewers out there I wouldn´t miss if my computer broke down…… but you´re not one of them!

    Keep up the good work!

    /Kjell
    (from the north of Sweden)

    Reply
    1. Jordan Steele says:
      September 22, 2013 at 8:43 am

      Thanks so much! I appreciate the kind words. Spread the news that the site exists! 🙂

      Reply
  11. Pat Reehal says:
    March 23, 2014 at 1:18 pm

    Jordan this is the most comprehensive and honest review I have read on this most underrated camera. Thank you.
    I love my X100 and when Amazon UK discounted the XM-1 heavily over Christmas it was rude not to buy one.Yes it is plastic and yes it has no viewfinder but by heck it produces such stunning results that I forgive it. It punches seriously above its weight and for the $360 it cost me with the XC 16-50mm I am delighted.

    Your review on the XT-1 is equally informative and, armed with a pump-action Debit card, I bought one last week. The XM-1 is wonderful, the XT-1 is sublime.

    Please continue your excellent work. I have bookmarked your site and recommended it to all of my colleagues who, like me, are all sick of the ‘Merda taurorum animas conturbit’ Brigade!

    Kind regards

    Pat

    Reply
  12. Michael M. says:
    April 3, 2014 at 2:11 pm

    Jordan… Although I am not an X-M1 user (I have an X-E1), I have to agree with the rest of the commenters here that you do have a wonderful way of giving us important technical information, user information, and lastly wonderful photographs. I sort of found your site by accident as I am a recent Fuji convert (I still shoot Nikon for paid work) but I am going to also keep your site bookmarked as a key contributor to the photography knowledge base. Please keep up the good work you are doing, and keep on adding your much higher than average camera/lens review photos to your posts. I especially like your water plants photo above. Really excellent.

    Reply
  13. Tri Rini Nuringtyas says:
    October 17, 2014 at 8:12 am

    I used this camera for almost a year. I really love it. Small and really suitable for me as a street photographer. My question I had already the 27 mm pancakes, kit Lens and the zoom lens. I want to buy mirelens which one is better the 60 mm or 35?

    Thank you

    Reply
  14. boom beach hack tool free download no survey,boom beach hack gratuit android,boom beach ios hack ifunbox,boom beach hack tool for android/ios,boom beach triche diamant,boom beach hack iphone,Boom Beach Free Hack,boom beach hack apk 22.70,boom beach ios ha says:
    October 8, 2015 at 3:21 pm

    En l’utilisant, vous devrez être suffisamment pourvu en or even et hierdoor diamant, grâce notamment
    à un générateur de diamants boom beachfront.

    Reply
  15. Pingback: Fujifilm X-M1 Camera Review - Daily Camera News

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Follow Me:

Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on RSSFollow Us on InstagramFollow Us on Mastodon

Most Popular Posts

  • "Full Frame Equivalence" and Why It Doesn't Matter (288)
  • Fuji X-Pro 2 vs. Sony A7 II: Noise Comparison (70)
  • Fuji 56mm f/1.2 vs. Panasonic Leica 42.5mm f/1.2 Nocticron (63)
  • Review: Metabones Speed Booster (Canon FD to Fuji X) (56)
  • Review: Olympus OM-D E-M5 (48)

Recent Comments

  • Anonymous on Ready for Launch!
  • Jordan Steele on Canon EOS R8 – First Impressions
  • J Williams on Canon EOS R8 – First Impressions
  • Davide on Review: Tamron 70-180mm f/2.8 Di III VXD
  • Peter on A Tripod in the Sky – DJI Air 2S Review

Archives

©2023 Admiring Light | Theme by SuperbThemes
We use cookies to personalize content and ads and to analyze our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with advertising and analytics partners who may combine it with other information that you’ve provided to them or that they’ve collected from your use of their services. You may consent to the use of cookies or opt out. Accept Reject Read More
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled

Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.

SAVE & ACCEPT